explores learning, leadership, education, schooling, teaching, digital technologies, edutech, books, literature, travel, genealogy, music, photography, citizen science and the impact of social media. George Orwell is often featured. Your commentary, collaboration and participation is encouraged and highly valued!
Archives
LATEST TWEETS
You likely know that #Orwell broadcast propaganda for the BBC 1941-43. I have never seen a copy of Talking to India: A Selection of English Language Broadcasts to India (edited with an Introduction by George Orwell) for sale till now. Finally, it has been added to my collection. pic.twitter.com/MHos…
'We will make their lives miserable': Police say they want to stop YouTube rap group OneFour. abc.net.au/news/2019…
The story of the 1948 Gotham Book Mart photo of #poets. slate.com/culture/20…
Chris Bonnor on #PISA johnmenadue.com/chri…
open.spotify.com/tra… A Nick Drake kind of morning...
The contract on Corbyn - Opinion - Israel News | Haaretz.com haaretz.com/opinion/…
Recent comments
-
Darcy Moore: Thanks Richard. I checked out your blog and particularly enj… on George Orwell and William Shakespeare
-
Richard Dispatch: A fantastic post, for sure. I have also read every word Orwe… on George Orwell and William Shakespeare
-
Mark Doyle: "Wanderings of a Spiritualist" turns up in antique bookshops… on Leon Gellert, George Orwell and Nineteen Eighty-Four
-
Darcy Moore: Thanks for this interesting comment, Mark. I will check out… on Leon Gellert, George Orwell and Nineteen Eighty-Four
-
Mark Doyle: One author who met Gellert and was effusive in his praise wa… on Leon Gellert, George Orwell and Nineteen Eighty-Four
Currently reading…
Darcy's bookshelf: currently-reading





tagged:
currently-reading, january-2016, japanese-literature, read-in-2016,...

My Flickr Photos
Most comments
- ‘The Cult of Hattie’: ‘wilful blindness’? (57)
- ALARM (A Learning and Response Matrix) #1 (49)
- Reading… (29)
- Teachers and Social Media (28)
- 10 things a 'DET teacher' can do in preparation for 1:1 (laptops) in classrooms (27)
- The first people I followed on twitter… (27)
- Education and Democracy (25)
- Social Reading: Fad or Future? (25)
- Pen & Paper Exams (24)
- 10 IDEAS: blogED Prezi (23)
- 10 questions for your child’s teacher (22)
- The end of the ‘Digital Education Revolution’? (22)
- The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) (21)
- ISER Conference Presentation – Web 2.0 & PLNs (21)
- PLNs and PLEs (21)
- The Best School Websites (21)
- BYOD (in a post-DER world) (20)
- Twitter Literati for English Teachers (19)
- 10 things 'a faculty' can do in preparation for 1:1 (laptops) in classrooms (18)
- Cool Online Tools (18)

DISCLAIMER
The views expressed at this site are my own and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
Shared fictions
Yuval Noah Harari posits that mass cooperation has always operated from belief in shared fictions. As an undergraduate, in animated discussion very late at night, I reached a similar conclusion almost thirty years ago. Mine was more a description of mass societal hallucination but nevertheless it felt like an important observation at the time. The question – what is the relevance of Harari’s insight for contemporary Australians? – is important and worth all of us exploring in our own lives.
Humans appear to be the only creatures that invent stories and have the ability to communicate them convincingly to others, on mass. Harari discusses religious stories, explaining how these shared fictions have assisted humans to cooperate, if indeed most believe the story to be true and find it worth following the precepts suggested, or in some cases, demanded. Oral storytelling and literature provided many stories that we understand to be useful fictions. Religion is another fiction, like money, that has been a useful tool in assisting humans to cooperate. Harari explains:
In Australia, it is difficult to know if ‘I can make use of it’ extends to politicians and religion due to personal belief or because of the nature of established, not yet anachronistic, power structures to which they are beholden. Probably both.
Truth and power often do not work well as a team. Historically, those who want power need to operate by spreading or confirming fictions. They need to demonstrate their adherence to (and support of) the story. Harari makes the point that throughout history many faced the dilemma: do I serve power or truth? Harari, ‘after some soul searching’, chose not to self-censor his opinions and arguments. He is Israeli and highly critical of what the education system in his country teaches:
He encourages readers to speak the truth about their countries too. He understands the challenges in doing this as most people, heavily ‘invested’ in the stories formed from early childhood by parents, teachers and their culture, are likely to use intellect to rationalise the story than to doubt it. In many societies, anyone who tries to speak out is ostracised or persecuted. Harari goes onto say:
The author continues, even though ‘Adam and Eve never existed’ and that much of the Bible is fictional ‘it can still bring joy to billions and can still encourage humans to be compassionate, courageous and creative – just like other great works of fiction, such as Don Quixote, War and Peace and Harry Potter’. This seems obvious but I never see Australian politicians asked to enunciate their beliefs about such matters or asked, do you believe in a supernatural deity?
Harari makes some very familiar arguments about religions and reality but his most interesting observations are about the return of Nationalism, challenging narratives about Globalisation and immigration, as demonstrated through the election of Donald Trump in the USA and British voters support of BREXIT. The spread of authoritarianism and rise of ’strongmen’ – such as Putin, Modhi, Trump, Erdogan, Orbán and Duterte – with little respect for democratic principles, although they all seem happy enough with market-based capitalism and religion, is clearly a trend. In the Western World, until very recently, the story of secular, liberal democracy supported by rational, applied science and allied with capitalism, had been an unchallenged paradigm (especially since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989). Also, China, a non-democratic, one-party state that has managed to improve living standards for hundreds of millions of citizens, challenges this once-dominant Western paradigm. How is that such a system can improve the lives of so many of its citizens?
Australian democracy is not immune to these challenges and it is in this context that we, collectively as a nation, need to be led sensibly, and with integrity, if the population is maintain a belief in democracy as a useful tool for mass cooperation. Should democracy be viewed as a shared fiction? One that still permits change if citizens are active and leaders courageous? If a shared fiction is required, properly functioning, transparent democratic rule, seems inherently useful. I will twist the issue Harari raises, that ‘laws, social norms, economic institutions – they might all collapse’ if the fiction is not perpetuated, to argue that unless change is wrought our democratic society risks imploding through disbelief, inaction and disingenuous political leadership that benefits just a few powerful individuals, vested interests and corporations. Australians must insist this does not continue to happen.
Education and Environmental Policy (sic) in Contemporary Australia
Why do Australia politicians espouse evidence-based policy for education and the environment but do the opposite? These politicians are supporting old power structures, or fictions, no longer believed by enough Australians to make them useful. Reality calls for different policies and more intelligent, courageous leadership.
Climate change science has been constantly undermined by Australian politicians. These same politicians always seem to purport belief in a supernatural deity too (and I can not think of an example of a non-believer who denies climate change but imagine there is). The new Prime Minister, Scott Morrison, is both a Pentecostal Christian and an advocate for coal. He has no difficulty in praying to a supernatural being seeking assistance for others but is apparently unable to make policy decisions that will allow humans to help themselves ameliorate the worst environmental challenges bought on by industrialisation and pollution. It seems very obvious that powerful vested interests have much to lose financially if the state moves away from fossil fuels to other energy sources.
Cognitive dissonance, in a nation where the leader of the country relies on fictions that are no longer shared or useful, is rife. Perhaps more tellingly, when that same leader does not follow the Christian values he purports to hold, more confusion about our shared identity results. There are many sensible questions that naturally arise. What happened to evidence-based policy in government? Is science a fiction? Why is it that the leader of a secular nation is praying to a supernatural deity? How ethical is it that this same leader invests billions in schools that are founded on religious institutions that believe in the same deity? Isn’t this similar to what has happened in (previously secular) Turkey?
The religious makeup of Australia has shifted during the last 50 years and only a very small percentage of those who identify a religion attend church regularly. The 2016 census revealed that 22.6% of the population identify as Catholic, 13.3% Anglican, 16.3% are ‘other Christians’ and over 30% of Australians have ‘no religion’. The proportion of people reporting to be affiliated with a religion other than Christianity has increased from 2.6% in 1991 to 8.2% in 2016. In 1966, 88% of the population were Christians. This shared fiction still permeates our politics even though the churches are empty. These numbers will reduce further at the next census, especially since the terrible revelations from the recent Royal Commission and the trial of George Pell, the third most senior Catholic.
At a time where Australia is demonstrably becoming less religious our political leaders are more so. The overwhelming majority of state premiers and opposition leaders believe in a supernatural deity, as does the Prime Minister and Federal Opposition Leader. This is worthy of mention for the simple reason that education policy is demonstrably impacted on by these beliefs. While writing this post the NSW Premier was alleged to have personally called the Catholic Archbishop of Sydney while she was in Rome to allay fears that NSW would block a $4.5 billion federal funding deal for schools. Considering this is the opposite of her Government’s public pronouncements, citizens cannot fail to be concerned. Academics, even those with religious beliefs, have been showing how Australia has been ‘Taking God to School’ for some decades now.
The state of play
Stories create paradigms that unify groups and assist cooperation. Australia is at a crossroads and needs better political leadership. The moment too many stop believing the societal story, economic, political or religious, the system falls apart. Trust is essential but importantly, our stories must be useful to maintaining a sense of purpose, harmony and direction.
If another story comes along that is more believable (or useful) the earlier fiction ceases to hold believers in its thrall. Enlightenment era science, and later the theory of evolution, led to doubt amongst Christians that the Bible was the literal word of God or that an afterlife – to torment or reward – awaited. The moment an individual no longer trusts that the money in their wallet or bank account will be useful, the currency depreciates. Of course, this trust is lost when other components of the system fail. Obvious examples are the Wall Street Crash in 1929, inflation in Weimar Germany or more recently, the Global Financial Crisis bought on by the sub-prime loans scandal in the USA or when society does not tax corporations appropriately, community confidence is lost.
Is the democratic system broken or will it allow transition to new policy needed to educate our people and protect the biosphere? We have to choose. In a democracy it is possible to change the direction of society and to make intelligent plans for the future. Harari writes reassuringly about our collective challenges. Even though ‘all these big stories are fictions generated by our own minds, there is no reason for despair’. Reality is still there, he tells us.
According to the latest analysis of the likely impact of climate change, we have very little time to look this reality in the face and make some changes to the beliefs and values we share. Harari’s insights are essential ones if we are to have an educated populace that can manage the environmental challenges that are upon us. Faith in a supernatural deity, or acquiescence to the tales told by those with vested interest in preserving the status quo, are fictions we can no longer afford. If such mindsets are preventing politicians from making decisions, or the community from understanding, in the interest of a shared future, we need to talk about it honestly.
I encourage you to read Harari’s books. The latest one can be explored here.